The Lion constellation and Sphinx are closely connected to the East. The Sky above Giza at Vernal Equinox in the year 36,400 BC: my proposal on Historical Golden Age of the Zep Tepi (processing by Armando Mei)
At the dawn of the vernal equinox, at an entire astronomical precessional cycle before 10,450 BC, all monuments of Giza were perfectly aligned with the constellations as follows: In the following table, what is most striking is the configuration of the sky above Giza in the year 36,420 BC.
Any other astronomical object, close to the monuments of Giza, were in the Sky at that time. In my opinion, this is not the right configuration, because I would expect to find Alnitak (the correspondent of the Great Pyramid, the most important monument of Giza) on the Meridian and not the pyramid of Mycerinus, the smaller pyramid of Giza. Remarkable is the position of Mintaka, because this star lies on the Meridian while Alnitak has moved toward the south-east. Planets have not a symbolic arrangement.Īt the dawn of the vernal equinox, the Constellation of Lion is right on the ecliptic, while the Constellation of Orion is on the Meridian. Al Nitak is not on the Meridian and not connected to the Great Pyramid. First of all, I analyzed the astronomical configuration concerning the sky above Giza in the year 10,450 BC (Bauval’s Theory).īauval’s Orion Correlation Theory – Vernal Equinox 10,500 BC. I studied the astronomical configuration of the sky above Giza in the remote past. But, when were the monuments of Giza built? Astronomical Configuration & the Zep Tepi In my opinion, all major monuments of Giza were built before the Dynastic Age to celebrate the Age of Osiris rule. I assume that the Zep Tepi was an historical time of prosperity. I do not believe that the First Time is a myth, as it is regarded by some researchers. While academics agree to confine its purpose to mythology, I believe that their position conflicts with the long lists of sovereigns found so accurately transcribed in Egyptian documents and temples. Still mysteries remain, for example, the dispute over the “Zep Tepi” (‘First Time’ or Golden Era). International Conference on Ancient Study, Zayed Univesity, Dubai. Particularly, he suggested that a perfect alignment between the former and the latter occurred in the year 10,450 BC.Īs a result of this, a fervid debate among scholars originated, which has long slowed, and at times even impeded, objective analysis of the pyramid complex.Īhmed Osman, Armando Mei, Robert Bauval and John Major Jenkins.
He proposed a correlation between the major pyramids of Giza and the three largest stars forming the Belt of Orion. In the last 20 years, one of the most outstanding theories, in scientific terms, is that proposed by Robert Bauval, known as The Orion Correlation Theory. This has created confusion among researchers and has affected our comprehension of the prehistory of Egypt. Unfortunately, academic Egyptologists have also persisted in misattributing some archaeological finds to Dynastic Egyptians, which I believe have little to do with that civilization. It is undeniable that “academic” Egyptology has greatly contributed to our knowledge of a unique and incomparable civilization, incredibly developed socially, artistically and scientifically. Some of these fall within the theories of the so called “independent school of Egyptology”, of which they constitute a great part. Many conjectures have been made concerning the monumental complex of Giza.
0 kommentar(er)
